ALL power to the group set up to keep Popham Airfield open and I wish them well in their endeavours (Popham Airfield: Campaign launched to fight 3,000-home plans - Basingstoke Gazette 16th May 2024).
The past few weeks have seen a great range of community activities taking place at the airfield and long may its success continue. So that begs the question, why choose to destroy this popular community asset, and replace it with 3,000 houses, when there are better alternatives that can serve Basingstoke?
READ MORE: Campaign launched to fight 3,000-home development plans for Hampshire airfield
And, why does the council want to subject our young families in need of housing to an isolated location where it will take many, many years, to provide the infrastructure needed, assuming it is provided at all. In failing to plan properly, and by failing to bring forward Manydown after 25 years, one wonders why on earth they have decided to sacrifice a much-loved community airfield? We need housing, and well-planned housing with the right infrastructure, but why keep picking sites that never get delivered?
As a resident of Bramley, I have seen our village suffer from the building of hundreds of houses because of “planning by appeal”- all caused by the council’s poor record of making sensible planning decisions. This draft plan seems to lack an evidence base that has considered the ability to actually deliver housing, and puts development in unsustainable areas far removed from the town itself. I fear that villages like mine, Bramley, will suffer yet more housing when the Inspectors decides the council has not done enough to show it has considered all options open to it. New housing should be placed where existing infrastructure can be improved and where the demand for homes exists – in or around Basingstoke itself. Surely that is the approach needed now in order to protect Bramley and other communities who have been most impacted by uncontrolled development in recent years.
Bruce Ansell
Bramley Green Road
Bramley
Send letters by email to newsdesk@basingstokegazette.co.uk or by post to Editor, Basingstoke Gazette, Absolutely Offices, Lutyens Cl, Lychpit, Basingstoke RG24 8AG.
All letters and emails must include full names and addresses (anonymous letters will not be published), although these details may be withheld from publication, on request.
Letters of 300 words or less will be given priority, although all are subject to editing for reasons of clarity, space, or legal requirements. We reserve the right to edit letters.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel